<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Preston: Owners are to blame for press decline, not the net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/preston-owners-are-to-blame-for-press-decline-not-the-net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/preston-owners-are-to-blame-for-press-decline-not-the-net/</link>
	<description>Comment, analysis and links covering online journalism and online news, citizen journalism, blogging, vlogging, photoblogging, podcasts, vodcasts, interactive storytelling, publishing, Computer Assisted Reporting, User Generated Content, searching and all things internet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Making money from journalism: new media business models (A model for the 21st century newsroom pt5) &#171; Online Journalism Blog</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/preston-owners-are-to-blame-for-press-decline-not-the-net/#comment-22147</link>
		<dc:creator>Making money from journalism: new media business models (A model for the 21st century newsroom pt5) &#171; Online Journalism Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/preston-owners-are-to-blame-for-press-decline-not-the-net/#comment-22147</guid>
		<description>[...] changes in society - particularly the rise of office- and computer-based occupations, the decline of city centre-based employment and use of public transport - have seen a reduction in the value (and accessibility) of the paper as a delivery platform. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] changes in society &#8211; particularly the rise of office- and computer-based occupations, the decline of city centre-based employment and use of public transport &#8211; have seen a reduction in the value (and accessibility) of the paper as a delivery platform. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: From &#8216;news that sells&#8217; to &#8216;news that moves&#8217; (A model for the 21st century newsroom pt4) &#171; Online Journalism Blog</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/preston-owners-are-to-blame-for-press-decline-not-the-net/#comment-20355</link>
		<dc:creator>From &#8216;news that sells&#8217; to &#8216;news that moves&#8217; (A model for the 21st century newsroom pt4) &#171; Online Journalism Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/preston-owners-are-to-blame-for-press-decline-not-the-net/#comment-20355</guid>
		<description>[...] any good distribution strategy relies on being where your readers are (and one of the reasons why traditional newspaper distribution has been failing for some time), so email newsletters, while they now seem old-fashioned, remain a useful part of any distribution [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any good distribution strategy relies on being where your readers are (and one of the reasons why traditional newspaper distribution has been failing for some time), so email newsletters, while they now seem old-fashioned, remain a useful part of any distribution [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everyone is a paperboy now (A model for the 21st century newsroom pt4) &#171; Online Journalism Blog</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/preston-owners-are-to-blame-for-press-decline-not-the-net/#comment-19169</link>
		<dc:creator>Everyone is a paperboy now (A model for the 21st century newsroom pt4) &#171; Online Journalism Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/preston-owners-are-to-blame-for-press-decline-not-the-net/#comment-19169</guid>
		<description>[...] any good distribution strategy relies on being where your readers are (and one of the reasons why traditional newspaper distribution has been failing for some time), so email newsletters, while they now seem old-fashioned, remain a useful part of any distribution [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any good distribution strategy relies on being where your readers are (and one of the reasons why traditional newspaper distribution has been failing for some time), so email newsletters, while they now seem old-fashioned, remain a useful part of any distribution [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Pundit &#187; From the Belly of the (Dying) Beast</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/preston-owners-are-to-blame-for-press-decline-not-the-net/#comment-11867</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Pundit &#187; From the Belly of the (Dying) Beast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/preston-owners-are-to-blame-for-press-decline-not-the-net/#comment-11867</guid>
		<description>[...] Preston: Owners are to blame for press decline, not the net « Online Journalism Blog  Submit to Stumbled Upon!  -Bill Quick                      comment on this article [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Preston: Owners are to blame for press decline, not the net « Online Journalism Blog  Submit to Stumbled Upon!  -Bill Quick                      comment on this article [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El culpable de la crisis &#171; En el Medio</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/preston-owners-are-to-blame-for-press-decline-not-the-net/#comment-11610</link>
		<dc:creator>El culpable de la crisis &#171; En el Medio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/preston-owners-are-to-blame-for-press-decline-not-the-net/#comment-11610</guid>
		<description>[...] Vía: Infotendencias / Online Blog Journalism [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vía: Infotendencias / Online Blog Journalism [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Infotendencias.com :: blog colectivo sobre convergencia periodística</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/preston-owners-are-to-blame-for-press-decline-not-the-net/#comment-11589</link>
		<dc:creator>Infotendencias.com :: blog colectivo sobre convergencia periodística</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 04:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/preston-owners-are-to-blame-for-press-decline-not-the-net/#comment-11589</guid>
		<description>[...] sobre el futuro de la prensa, celebrada en Cardiff a mediados de septiembre. Paul Bradshaw hace un certero resumen en su [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sobre el futuro de la prensa, celebrada en Cardiff a mediados de septiembre. Paul Bradshaw hace un certero resumen en su [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: contentious.com - links for 2007-09-25</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/preston-owners-are-to-blame-for-press-decline-not-the-net/#comment-10924</link>
		<dc:creator>contentious.com - links for 2007-09-25</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/preston-owners-are-to-blame-for-press-decline-not-the-net/#comment-10924</guid>
		<description>[...] Preston: Owners are to blame for press decline, not the net « Online Journalism Blog &#8220;Danger in introversion: We don’t notice the world changing around us until it’s too late. Introversion means a fatal lack of communication in a communications business, and a refusal to make fresh connections or form new alliances.&#8221; (tags: newspapers news+biz media+evolution change society business journalism psychology problems tidbits+fodder) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Preston: Owners are to blame for press decline, not the net « Online Journalism Blog &#8220;Danger in introversion: We don’t notice the world changing around us until it’s too late. Introversion means a fatal lack of communication in a communications business, and a refusal to make fresh connections or form new alliances.&#8221; (tags: newspapers news+biz media+evolution change society business journalism psychology problems tidbits+fodder) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard McDonough</title>
		<link>http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/preston-owners-are-to-blame-for-press-decline-not-the-net/#comment-10860</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard McDonough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinejournalismblog.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/preston-owners-are-to-blame-for-press-decline-not-the-net/#comment-10860</guid>
		<description>There are many fewer customers for bridles than in the early 20th century.  The decline in that business was not the fault of the bridle makers or sellers, but a result of a shrinking marketplace due to the advent of the internal combustion engine used to drive four wheeeled (and some three-wheeled) vehicles.  

Markets change and marketers must adapt.  

The business has been piggishly profitable until recently, and with the advent of the internet and the sophistication of the technology around it, many have become dependent on it (not a bad thing) and television (a very bad thing) for news and information.  

With the newspaper business having been, by and large, taken over by corporations with no essential interest in the news business, per se, but quite attracted by the large profits available, the change in the size of circulation and thus profits, have soured their distended bellies.  Given their business model, they shrink staff to save money, second guess the readers by feeding them lighter fare and pap, and in the process alienate the folks who love print, who love good journalism; which, of course, compounds the &quot;problem.&quot;  

If properly priced and made available for purchase and management by people actually devoted to print journalism, good profits could be made, good journalists could be employed, and good readers could be satisfied..

None of this will happen, of course, as the handbasket containing this world is very much on its way to its destination.  Bring a fan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many fewer customers for bridles than in the early 20th century.  The decline in that business was not the fault of the bridle makers or sellers, but a result of a shrinking marketplace due to the advent of the internal combustion engine used to drive four wheeeled (and some three-wheeled) vehicles.  </p>
<p>Markets change and marketers must adapt.  </p>
<p>The business has been piggishly profitable until recently, and with the advent of the internet and the sophistication of the technology around it, many have become dependent on it (not a bad thing) and television (a very bad thing) for news and information.  </p>
<p>With the newspaper business having been, by and large, taken over by corporations with no essential interest in the news business, per se, but quite attracted by the large profits available, the change in the size of circulation and thus profits, have soured their distended bellies.  Given their business model, they shrink staff to save money, second guess the readers by feeding them lighter fare and pap, and in the process alienate the folks who love print, who love good journalism; which, of course, compounds the &#8220;problem.&#8221;  </p>
<p>If properly priced and made available for purchase and management by people actually devoted to print journalism, good profits could be made, good journalists could be employed, and good readers could be satisfied..</p>
<p>None of this will happen, of course, as the handbasket containing this world is very much on its way to its destination.  Bring a fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
